A new commander of Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh has been appointed

On September 9, Armenian Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan received a new commander of the Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh, Major General Mikhail Kosobokov.

During the meeting Karapetyan highly appreciated Russia’s efforts to stabilize the military-political situation in the region and the role of the Russian peacekeeping mission in Karabakh.

It has to be kept in mind that before his appointment Kosobokov held the position of deputy commander of the 58th combined army of Russia (Southern military district). At one time, Kosobokov commanded a Russian military base in Abkhazia. –

Source: Turan News Agency

The cool weather to continue

On September 10, the cloudy weather will continue in Baku and Absheron, no precipitation is expected. The wind is north-western, moderate.

The air temperature during the day is +24+26 degrees, the sea water temperature on the beaches of Absheron is within +23+25.

In a number of mountainous regions of the country, thunderstorms will pass in the afternoon, in the rest of the country, mostly without precipitation. In the morning, there is fog in some places, the wind is eastern.

The air temperature in low-lying areas during the day is +25+29; in the mountains it will be +12+17.

Source: Turan News Agency

“A territory controlled by Russia has appeared in Karabakh now”

Baku and Moscow have not yet agreed on the mandate of the Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh, Azerbaijani presidential aide for international affairs Hikmet Hajiyev told the BBC.

“Discussions on additional agreements and additional legal mechanisms related to the mandate of the peacekeepers are still ongoing,” he said.

The actions and operations of the Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh are carried out in accordance with the trilateral statement of the leaders of Azerbaijan, Russia and Armenia dated November 10, 2020.

“All Karabakh is the sovereign territory of Azerbaijan, the international community recognizes the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Azerbaijan, and in accordance with the statement of November 10, peacekeeping forces were temporarily deployed in a certain part of the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan,” Hajiyev said.

What did Hikmet Hajiyev mean when he made such a statement? It turns out that there are no formal grounds for the stay of peacekeepers in Karabakh, and are their activities carried out on the basis of oral agreements?

Political observer Shahin Jafarli answered ASTNA questions in connection with this statement.

***

Question: What did you and Hikmet Hajiyev mean when they said that “Baku and Moscow have not yet agreed on the mandate of the Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh”?

Answer: The statement of Hikmet Hajiyev is quite clear. That is, there is a document on the table that regulates the status of Russian peacekeepers. The document was prepared by Russia. However, the Azerbaijani side has not yet signed the document, as it does not suit Azerbaijan. In this regard, negotiations between the parties continue.

Question: It turns out that at present there are no legal grounds for the presence of peacekeepers in Karabakh, and their activity is carried out on the basis of an oral agreement? In other words, does Azerbaijan have the right to expel Russian peacekeepers from its territory at any time?

Answer: Russian peacekeepers operate in Karabakh on the basis of an agreement of November 10, 2020, that is, a joint statement. However, this statement is not a document regulating the activities of peacekeepers. It indicates only the entry of the peacekeepers into the area, their number and the amount of military equipment at their disposal. It also indicates where the peacekeepers will be deployed. That is, on the line of contact and along the Lachin corridor. By the way, Russia’s actions actually contradict this provision. As I have already noted, the statement says that the peacekeepers will be deployed on the line of contact and along the Lachin corridor, but in fact today a territory under Russian control has formed in Karabakh. De facto, there is a territory controlled by Russia, and the sovereignty of the Azerbaijani state is not ensured there. State bodies of Azerbaijan cannot enter this territory. In essence, this contradicts the November 10 statement. As for Azerbaijan’s right to expel Russian peacekeepers from its territory, a specific deadline was set in the November 10 statement. There is a deadline. If none of the parties objects 6 months before the expiration of the first 5 years, the mandate of the peacekeepers will automatically be extended for another 5 years.

Question: According to the Russian media, on the eve of November 10 there were reports that along with the statement there was a separate document on the status of the peacekeepers. Although Russia and Armenia signed the document, Azerbaijan refused to sign it. Why did Azerbaijan refuse to sign the document? What did not suit Azerbaijan in this document?

Answer: The received information shows that the Azerbaijani side has conditions for signing the document. The main condition is control over the Lachin corridor. But there are other conditions. This is unofficial information. Other conditions are the expulsion of all illegal Armenian armed groups in Karabakh and Azerbaijan’s participation in the creation of local self-government in Khankendi. In other words, Baku has set these three conditions. These conditions are aimed at restoring Azerbaijan’s sovereignty both over the Lachin corridor and over the territory in Karabakh, de facto controlled by Russia. But it seems that Russia does not agree with these conditions and does not accept them. For this reason, the question is being delayed. These conditions, of course, fully comply with the norms of international law. Because we are talking about the internationally recognized territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Russia has de facto illegally established an administration in the area. Now Azerbaijan wants to restore its control and sovereignty over these territories. He put forward conditions in this direction. If the conditions are accepted, Azerbaijan can sign a document on the mandate of the peacekeepers.

Question: According to the media, Azerbaijan demands that only Azerbaijan and Russia sign the document on the status of Russian peacekeepers. In your opinion, can Azerbaijan put forward such a demand and is he right in putting forward it?

Answer: Of course, this document must be signed between Azerbaijan and Russia. Because the talk is about a peacekeeping operation carried out on the territory of Azerbaijan. The Armenian state has nothing to do with this issue. From this point of view, if such a condition was really put forward by Baku, then it is quite fair and corresponds to international law.

Question: What do you think, is it even worthwhile for Azerbaijan to sign such a document and thereby giving the Russian peacekeepers a legal basis?

Answer: The document on the mandate of these peacekeepers has not yet been published, and we do not know its content. We do not know what specific provisions are there, whether there are points that contradict the sovereignty of Azerbaijan. But having examined similar documents adopted during Russia’s previous conflicts in the post-Soviet space, that is, peacekeeping operations in South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Transnistria, we will see that the peacekeeping forces have very broad powers there. Peacekeepers have extremely broad security, law enforcement and humanitarian responsibilities. In fact, they act as local governments in these areas. I think that the Azerbaijani government is trying to prevent the inclusion of such items in the document. Most likely, these articles are also in this document. Because Russia wants to apply the already implemented ready-made model of the peacekeepers’ mandate in Karabakh. Azerbaijan is absolutely right when it does not accept this and, as I said, puts forward additional conditions aimed at ensuring the sovereign rights of Azerbaijan. From this point of view, of course, it is impossible to sign the document in the form in which Russia is proposing it. But if the conditions of Azerbaijan are accepted, then it can be signed. Provided that the document does not include new terms for the stay of peacekeepers in Karabakh. Because there are speculations about Russia’s intentions to keep its armed forces in Karabakh on a long-term basis. If the document provides for a new term, then Azerbaijan should not agree to this.

Source: Turan News Agency

“Line of Defense” draws attention to the facts of human rights violations

The non-governmental organization “Line of Protection” published a report on the human rights situation in Azerbaijan in August 2021.

Based on its monitoring, the organization states mass violations of rights, protection of honor and dignity, freedom of assembly, speech and expression. Also, in the reviewed period, the rights to equality before the law and the court, to a fair trial were violated.

In particular, the organization points to the fact that lawyer Joshgun Iskender was beaten by a police officer in the hall of the Shirvan court of appeal.

Besides, the police violently dispersed the protest of feminists, and its participants were subjected to insults and physical pressures at the Khazar region police department.

A group of defendants in the “Tovuz case” who were on a dry hunger strike protesting against unjustified criminal prosecution was subjected to unjustified punishment and placed into a punishment cell.

According to the organization, an activist of the “Muslim Unity”, Abbas Huseyn, was tortured in the colony # 8. The reason for this was Huseyn’s assessment of social and situation in the country.

In August, three animal rights protection activists were administratively arrested – Nijat Ismayilov, Elkhan Mirzoev and Nijat Azayev, who actively criticized the work of the Toplan homeless dog care center. Activists believe that this center continues the traditions of the “dog box”. Before the arrest, the police dispersed their rally in the center of Baku.

The report also points to the violation of the rights of Islamists, dispersal of believers in the park with portraits of martyrs of the Karabakh war, an administrative arrest of religious activist Mehdi Shamilly, condemnation to long terms of the defendants in the “Ganja case”.

As for political activists, there is an arrest on trumped-up charges of a member of the Party of People’s Front of Azerbaijan, Agil Humbatov, who criticized the authorities for their devil-may-care attitude to the poor and large families. After his arrest, under coercion, he confessed to stabbing another person.

Activist Bakhtiar Hajiyev has sued President Ilham Aliyev for having his account removed from the head of state’s Facebook page due to critical comments.

* It should stressed that the”Line of Protection” was set up a year ago by a group of civil society activists. Its executive director is a former investigator of the prosecutor’s office and ex-political prisoner Rufat Safarov.–

The non-governmental organization “Line of Protection” published a report on the human rights situation in Azerbaijan in August 2021.

Based on its monitoring, the organization states mass violations of rights, protection of honor and dignity, freedom of assembly, speech and expression. Also, in the reviewed period, the rights to equality before the law and the court, to a fair trial were violated.

In particular, the organization points to the fact that lawyer Joshgun Iskender was beaten by a police officer in the hall of the Shirvan court of appeal.

Besides, the police violently dispersed the protest of feminists, and its participants were subjected to insults and physical pressures at the Khazar region police department.

A group of defendants in the “Tovuz case” who were on a dry hunger strike protesting against unjustified criminal prosecution was subjected to unjustified punishment and placed into a punishment cell.

According to the organization, an activist of the “Muslim Unity”, Abbas Huseyn, was tortured in the colony # 8. The reason for this was Huseyn’s assessment of social and situation in the country.

In August, three animal rights protection activists were administratively arrested – Nijat Ismayilov, Elkhan Mirzoev and Nijat Azayev, who actively criticized the work of the Toplan homeless dog care center. Activists believe that this center continues the traditions of the “dog box”. Before the arrest, the police dispersed their rally in the center of Baku.

The report also points to the violation of the rights of Islamists, dispersal of believers in the park with portraits of martyrs of the Karabakh war, an administrative arrest of religious activist Mehdi Shamilly, condemnation to long terms of the defendants in the “Ganja case”.

As for political activists, there is an arrest on trumped-up charges of a member of the Party of People’s Front of Azerbaijan, Agil Humbatov, who criticized the authorities for their devil-may-care attitude to the poor and large families. After his arrest, under coercion, he confessed to stabbing another person.

Activist Bakhtiar Hajiyev has sued President Ilham Aliyev for having his account removed from the head of state’s Facebook page due to critical comments.

* It should stressed that the”Line of Protection” was set up a year ago by a group of civil society activists. Its executive director is a former investigator of the prosecutor’s office and ex-political prisoner Rufat Safarov.

Source: Turan News Agency

Armenians and Azerbaijanis reckon with war’s psychological toll

The Second Karabakh War is nearly a year in the past. But the psychological wounds on both sides of the conflict remain.

In both Armenia and Azerbaijan, soldiers and civilians continue to suffer from the aftereffects of last fall’s 44-day war. Governments and private initiatives moved quickly to bolster the two countries’ limited psychiatric capacity, but questions remain about how they will manage to deal with what promises to be a long-term problem.

It is a problem that both societies have been reckoning with for decades – since the last war they fought in the 1990s.

“For 30 years we have been in a situation of war but we still don’t have a unified system for psychological and social assistance to soldiers,” said Hayk Khachikyan, an Armenian psychologist who has counseled war veterans. “Even soldiers who serve two years [the usual term for a conscript] come back so traumatized, let alone those who took part in the war,” he told Eurasianet. “They have serious problems with social adaptation, they come back shocked, mentally crushed.”

Rey Karimoghlu, an Azerbaijani journalist and veteran of the first war, said that this winter four or five soldiers a day were contacting him asking for help with their psychological problems following the war. “This problem has existed for many years,” he told the BBC’s Azerbaijani service. “We have been talking about the need to solve this problem for so long but the problems remain. We [first-war veterans] are used to this but they [second-war veterans] are not.”

Lingering trauma

Azerbaijani media have recorded eight suicides of veterans around the country as of June; seven of them had fought in last fall’s war.

Gulara Mansurova said that her son Yunis had become noticeably more aggressive after returning from the front. “He was saying some guys were not even in serious fighting and they got medals, while he went all the way to Shusha and got nothing in return; I was telling him to thank God for coming out alive,” she told Eurasianet.

When he visited the family home near Baku on leave in January, she suggested he may need help. “He would get angry, saying, ‘Why in the world do I need a psychologist?’” she recalled, in tears. “But when he was calm, he would agree, saying, ‘Let me settle my release from the army, then we will go.’” A week after arriving home, however, he hanged himself.

In Armenia, the state prosecutor’s office released a statement in June saying that it had connected a number of recent suicides and suicide attempts to post-war psychological trauma. The report described one veteran, following his suicide attempts: “After the war ended he could not sleep, he had visions of the bodies of killed soldiers, he was constantly afraid and did not want to live.”

Providing help

Both societies have marshaled what resources they have to aid soldiers and others who are suffering.

During and immediately after the war, more than 100 Armenian psychologists volunteered to work with soldiers in inpatient care, holding a total of about 11,000 counseling sessions as of December 2020. “This greatly contributed to the fact that many complications that we expected to see did not develop among these people,” Armen Soghoyan, the head of the Armenian Psychiatric Association, told Eurasianet.

Soghoyan leads one of eight organizations that cooperate as the Psychological Support Consortium, which won a government tender to provide psychological help to those affected by the war. Before the government program started in June, the consortium’s member organizations were working without funding. “That couldn’t last long,” Soghoyan said. “Back then we were sitting passively, waiting to see who will come to us for help. But now the government provides us with the list [of soldiers and their family members], we contact them, invite them for consultations.”

The consortium also provides a hotline that was originally set up to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Once the war started, the hotline shifted to helping those affected by the war.

Many Armenian soldiers from the recent war who need medical care are treated at the Soldier’s Home, a rehabilitation center established in 2018 by the Ministry of Defense and Yerevan State Medical University.

At Soldier’s Home, all patients meet with psychologists to determine whether they need therapy. Apart from its therapists on staff, the center cooperates with on-call psychologists from Yerevan State University’s Center of Applied Psychology.

During the war, the center set up a rapid response project to help those injured, displaced or otherwise affected by the war. With support from the United Nations Development Program, the center established a separate psychological care initiative and has helped over 200 people during the past six months. “They undergo a sustained psychotherapeutic process, which means not one, but regular meetings, six to eight meetings on average,” said the center’s director, David Gevorgyan.

While most psychological support programs operate from Yerevan, regional initiatives also have emerged. In Kapan, in southern Armenia on the border with Azerbaijan, the local community center and NGOs provide psychological help to families displaced from Nagorno Karabakh.

When the family of one woman, who gave her name only as Gayane, was forced to flee their home in Karabakh to Kapan, her middle son began to act out, refusing to go to school and not communicating with his friends.

But Gayane started taking her son to group therapy sessions run by World Vision-Armenia and the community-run Kapan Center for Children and led by psychologist Anush Grigoryan. The sessions worked, Gayane said: “He’s great, like normal, he lives his life like he did before.”

Another member of the group, Inna, said she felt isolated before joining. “We carried all that in us. Somehow we couldn’t talk about this, share it with people, because there are people who do not understand. But here, Miss Anush does understand, it is possible to open up and talk.”

In Azerbaijan, several state agencies have initiatives aimed at helping both soldiers and civilians with post-war psychological issues. Three ministries – the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection, and the Ministry of Defense – each launched its own working group to help people affected by the war.

The social protection ministry oversees two agencies responsible for citizens’ appeals regarding post-war-trauma-related issues. One, the State Social-Medical Examination and Rehabilitation Agency, helps veterans get placed at one of 12 state-run rehabilitation facilities around the country. The government has been publicizing the work of these centers, emphasizing that the state is caring for those who won the war and that the country has the resources to do it.

Another public entity, the Social Services Agency, has created a hotline for veterans and families of fallen soldiers. The hotline has so far received 1,600 calls since the end of the war; psychologists and psychiatrists on the line can refer callers to online therapy sessions. The most common symptoms it has seen are stress, depression, anxiety, hallucinations, and panic attacks, the agency told Eurasianet in written responses to questions.

The agency also arranges in-person consultations. It started a week after the end of the war in the heavily hit cities of Barda and Terter, and later expanded across the country. The program lasted until the end of February, and in that time served nearly 3,000 families, the agency said.

In March, the family of Emin Safarov, who fought for Azerbaijan in last year’s war, began to fear that he was threaten his wife and children. Although by that time the Social Services Agency had stopped offering in-person consultations, it quickly responded to the family’s call and sent two psychologists to meet with them, Safarov’s wife, Parvana Safarova, told Eurasianet.

“They listened to all of us. We felt much better after the meeting. They talked to the city hospital and agreed with the psychologist there to work with Emin,” Safarova said. After a few sessions with that psychologist Emin decided to stop, saying that the conversations reminded him too much of the “bloody” days of the war, but Safarova said she hopes he will eventually start again.

Limited resources

Azerbaijan has “a shortage of specialists” qualified to help with people suffering from post-traumatic stress disorders, said Azad Isazade, a psychologist who worked in camps for displaced people following the First Karabakh War. But he said he hopes that the experiences gained from the more recent conflict will advance the field in Azerbaijan and help educate a new generation of psychologists.

In Armenia, too, there is a lack of qualified specialists. “The level of professional training is far from being optimal,” said Gevorgyan of the Center of Applied Psychology. “There are of course some very good specialists, there also are many who took refresher courses, but it is worrying how often we witness a dilettantish approach.”

“Even counting not very good ones, we don’t have enough specialists to ensure 100 percent accessibility” to those who need help, he said.

Funding, too, is uncertain. In August, the charitable organization All Armenia Fund announced that it was ending a project paying for veterans to receive psychological care. Government funding for the Psychological Support Consortium also is scheduled to expire by winter.

But Soghoyan of the Armenian Psychiatric Association said he hopes the program can be extended, perhaps with support from international organizations. “This is drastically needed. Ending the project would be a problem,” he said.

Source: Turan News Agency

Georgia is ready for mediation between Armenia and Azerbaijan

It should be stated that the official visit of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to Georgia on September 8 was driven by the need to accelerate the process of peace and cooperation establishment in the South Caucasus.

“Most of our discussions and today’s negotiations were devoted to the agenda of opening an era of peaceful development in our region which I and representatives of our political force discussed in detail with our people during the early elections,” Pashinyan declared at a press conference following the results of negotiations with Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili.

Under the peaceful development, Pashinyan meant the opening of transport communications that have been blocked since the beginning of the 1990s; the delimitation and demarcation of the border with Azerbaijan, and the resumption of negotiations within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group.

This approach was publicly voiced by the head of the Armenian Foreign Ministry, Ararat Mirzoyan who accompanied the Prime Minister. The latter expressed two claims in his conversation with the Georgian vis-a-vis David Zalkaliani: Azerbaijan declines from returning Armenian prisoners of war and infiltrates the territory of Armenia.

The Armenian guests publicly kept away from the peace agreement with Azerbaijan which implies the recognition of each other’s borders, as well as the need to recognize the independence of the Armenians of Karabakh. Reports from Yerevan show that the first issue is being considered by the entire Armenian society while the second issue is an irritant factor in Azerbaijan in terms where attempts are being made to launch direct peace negotiations Aliyev-Pashinyan with the mediation of Georgia.

The fact that such negotiations are possible in the near future, and even through the mediation of Georgia, was indirectly mentioned by both Prime Ministers, pointing to the experience of resolving the problem of Armenian prisoners of war and mine fields created by Armenians in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan.

It is important to note that through the mediation of Garibashvili, Pashinyan and Aliyev managed to exchange 15 Armenian prisoners of war for partial maps of minefields. It should be remembered that Garibashvili visited Baku on May 5 after telephone consultations with Pashinyan, and on June 12, the transfer of 15 Armenian citizens took place on the border between Azerbaijan and Georgia with the participation of representatives of the Georgian authorities. In response, Azerbaijan received maps from Armenia showing 97,000 anti-tank and anti-personnel mines.

“As you know, Georgia has always been a follower of peaceful cooperation and coexistence in the South Caucasus. And we have recently proved this in practice. A few months ago, we had the opportunity – thanks to my mediation and the direct participation and commitment of Mr. Prime Minister, as well as thanks to the efforts of the President of Azerbaijan – and we, our three countries and their leaders succeeded to achieve success in the issue of releasing Armenian prisoners of war so that they could return to their homes, and providing Azerbaijan with important documentation, namely maps. This successful precedent strengthens our optimism,” said Garibashvili making it clear that exactly the same result might be achieved on the entire range of issues.

At the same time, he did not hide that his optimism in resolving the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict became even stronger after a face-to-face conversation with his Armenian counterpart.

“I got acquainted with a new vision of Mr. Prime Minister that concerns only the development, stable development and well-being of his country and the Armenian people. The Karabakh war was certainly a difficult challenge for our region but now that I know what the new vision of Mr. Prime Minister is, I believe that this challenge will turn into a new opportunity to bring prosperity to Armenia and the Armenian people. I would also like to say that the stability of Armenia is very important for us, both politically and economically which is directly related to the stability of our country and the region as a whole. Therefore, I would like to express our common regional goal in three words – peace, stability and prosperity which unites us, all three countries of the region, ” Garibashvili said.

It should be noted that the speech of the Georgian Prime Minister made it clear that he was prepared to act as a mediator in the Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations at a high level.

“…I once again confirmed to the Prime Minister Georgia’s full readiness to continue the role of active mediator for restoration of the trust which is very important to form fundamentals of our future cooperation,” Garibashvili stressed.

Recently, the co-chair countries (the United States, Russia and France) of the Minsk Group have been increasingly urging Armenia and Azerbaijan to start substantive negotiations within the framework of the process. However, statements from Baku and Yerevan indicate that the confidence in the Minsk Group as a whole or in its individual members has been undermined. In this respect, the inclusion of neighboring Georgia in the negotiation process looks like a much more reliable factor with elements of guarantees in the agreements reached behind the scenes.

Source: Turan News Agency