Yerevan: In its previous materials, the editorial office of Minval Politika had already exposed the scale of the anti-Azerbaijani campaign carried out by former International Criminal Court prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo. It was shown that an entire network consisting of political and information pressure against Azerbaijan is operating, and that the names of Josep Borrell, as well as Russian businessmen of Armenian origin Samvel Karapetyan and Ruben Vardanyan, appear in this network.
According to Azeri-Press News Agency, Ocampo himself openly admitted that artificial intelligence and a supercomputer in Brazil were planned to be used against Baku. In other words, this is no longer about the chaotic activities of individual lobbyists, but about an international pressure system established against Azerbaijan.
However, new materials received by the editorial office reveal an even more alarming picture. The video footage published today clearly shows who is behind the hysteria raised in recent months around the illegal structures demolished in Azerbaijan's Karabakh region. Armenian lobbyists are trying to present those structures as 'ancient churches.' Furthermore, the footage also makes it clear which representatives of the Armenian authorities and Pashinyan's inner circle maintained contact with Ocampo and effectively supported this campaign.
The video footage and its transcript reveal conversations between Ocampo and an interlocutor regarding the political dynamics in Armenia and the involvement of Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan in the anti-Azerbaijani campaign. Ocampo confirms that he has 'good relations' with Mirzoyan, which raises significant questions about the Armenian authorities' true intentions concerning peace talks and relations with Azerbaijan.
As can be seen from the published materials, the name of one of Nikol Pashinyan's closest associates - Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan - appears in the campaign surrounding the detained Armenians. Moreover, Ocampo himself confirms that he has 'good relations' with him.
This revelation casts doubt on Yerevan's commitment to peace, suggesting either a rogue element within its leadership or a deliberate strategy to undermine Azerbaijan through covert operations and international lobbying. The involvement of Armenian diaspora and Western political platforms in these campaigns further complicates the geopolitical landscape.
The issue of 'ancient churches' is particularly contentious, as the video footage suggests that the narrative of 'destruction of Christian heritage,' promoted abroad, is coordinated by Ocampo and his associates. In reality, these structures were built during the occupation and do not represent genuine ancient Christian monuments, which Azerbaijan continues to preserve and restore.
The exposure of these activities highlights a significant information and political operation against Azerbaijan, revealing the complexities of the ongoing conflict and the challenges in achieving a genuine peace process. The Armenian government, particularly under the leadership of Nikol Pashinyan, is urged to clarify its stance and end any duplicity in its diplomatic dealings with Azerbaijan.
In conclusion, the exposure of Ararat Mirzoyan's ties with Ocampo necessitates a reevaluation of Yerevan's policies and diplomatic strategies. Without transparency and a genuine commitment to peace, the Armenian authorities' statements risk being dismissed as mere political posturing.